INCORPORATING CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN THE BOARD – by Hemant Batra
“Corporate Social Responsibility is the continuing commitment by business to behave ethically and contribute to economic development while improving the quality of life of the workforce and their families as well as of the local community and society at large”
There are three emerging perspectives that form corporate social responsibility.
A business perspective that recognises the importance of ‘reputation capital’ for capturing and sustaining markets.
An eco-social perspective they also recognise the fact that increasing poverty can lead to social and political instability. Seen from the eco-social perspective, corporate social responsibility is both a value and a strategy to ensuring the sustainability of business. It is a strategy because it helps to reduce social tensions and facilitate markets. For the new
The rights-based perspective on corporate responsibility which stresses that consumers, employees, affected communities and shareholders have a right to know about corporations and their business. This perspective stresses accountability, transparency and social and environmental investment as the key aspects of corporate social responsibility.
The CSR should not be merely a statement of intent. It should be made compulsory for the corporate operating in India. This will definitely help in upholding human rights.
It considers that a corporation is not just a self-centered profit-making entity, but that the company and its actions are also integral to the economy, society, and environment in which they occur. Directors and officers are becoming ever more aware that CSR may provide human rights, labor, and environmental protections to the communities in which they live and to the people they employ. The business case for such social responsibility among corporations is becoming clearer as globalization progresses.
What CSR comprises will differ from company to company and industry to industry.
Directors’ Responsibility
The duties are as follows:-
Attend meetings regularly. Disclosure with respect to their directorship and their shareholding in the company is to be done. When the board is to decide on issues on which the director has interest he should not vote or make nay deliberation to such an effect.
Exercise the authority and power with due diligence and discharging the fiduciary duty of the office in best interest of the company.
The personal interest of the directors should not conflict with the interest of the company and should not come in way of discharge of his duties.
They should not engage in transactions to derive their personal benefits or benefit of his other relative or try to influence the transaction. There should be independent judgment to the best of the interest of the company.
Abide or comply with the policies of the company.
Conduct business in compliance with competition laws and principles of fair market competition.
Maintain high ethical and professional standards.
Responsibility towards protecting the environment improving the human life
Maintain confidentiality.
Use company’s property only for official purposes. Should not be misused and to be used with due authorization.
Deal fairly with members, suppliers, employees and partners.
Respect safety and health of all the employees and provide safe working conditions. The safety of community at large is also to be taken into consideration.
Not take up any activity competing with the business of the company.
Conclusion
In taking up the question of Corporate Social Responsibility (SCR) it is very important to critically delve into the ends and means question to glean the real essence of the organisational policy towards civil society. Hence while Corporate Social Responsibility is a term that transcends the corporate world and is generic in nature so much so that it concerns every single type of organisation that has a social conscience, it is certainly not window dressing for an organisation to don a façade of social respectability.
2 Comments »
Leave a comment
-
Recent
- Part 3: Anti-Corruption Compliance and Enforcement Issues In India – By Hemant K Batra
- Kaden Boriss: 7 months in LLP, 4 new partners | Law firms – Legally India | News for Lawyers | Indian legal market news and community
- Kaden Boriss: 7 months in LLP, 4 new partners | Law firms – Legally India | News for Lawyers | Indian legal market news and community
- Part 2: Anti-Corruption Compliance and Enforcement Issues In India – by Hemant K Batra
- Part 1: Anti-Corruption Compliance and Enforcement Issues In India – by Hemant K Batra
- COMPETITION LAW POLICY IN THE BANKING SECTOR by Hemant K Batra
- Impact Of Trade Policies On The Rural by Hemant K Batra
- Regionalism As Against Globalization Part III by Hemant K Batra
- The Rainmaker – 10 Questions – With Hemant Batra
- Regionalism As Against Globalization Part II by Hemant K Batra
- Isolated India in South Asia – by Hemant K Batra
- Regionalism As Against Globalization Part 1 (By Hemant K Batra)
-
Links
-
Archives
- December 2009 (3)
- November 2009 (1)
- October 2009 (2)
- September 2009 (5)
- August 2009 (3)
- July 2009 (6)
- June 2009 (3)
- May 2009 (2)
- April 2009 (6)
- March 2009 (6)
- February 2009 (4)
-
Categories
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
Hemant K Batra is a international Corporate, Business & Strategist Commercial Lawyer with more than 15 years of diverse experience; his practice is concentrated across the Globe in general, specifically in India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, Maldives, Pakistan, Singapore, Thailand, Hong Kong, Mauritius, Kuwait, UK and Australia. He is a connoisseur of international Business Law, Cross Border Investment Policy & Procedures, Commercial and Transactional Law, Corporate Law including Corporate Management, Good Governance & Corporate Restructuring, Mergers, Acquisitions, Takeovers, Real Estate Acquisitions & Regularization Consulting and Documentation; he also has expertise in the matters pertaining to Anti-Corruption/Anti-Bribery compliances and enforcement in context of FCPA and related provisions in India and Legal Auditing. He has advised large multi national corporations on diverse legal issues.
Thanks for the good post! I wonder if JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs “relativize” the CSR field (by their continued bonuses and risk-taking after the bailout). I just posted on that.
I agree with you; they must or else their bailout will become meaningless and insignificant.